"But it will not work this time for the effete intellectual bullies for whom the race card traditionally has been the trump card.", post William Jacobson today.
How quaint to conjure the old bugaboo of the revanchist right: the pointy headed intellectuals. And who does Mr. Jacobson call out?
"Not surprisingly, the pace of racial accusations has picked up as opposition has grown. Just in the past few days the usual and not-so-usual suspects have been seeking to out-do each other in making accusations of racism including Eugene Robinson, Maureen Dowd, Jimmy Carter, Rep. Hank Johnson, Chris Matthews, a wide range of Democratic politicians, and of course, almost all of the mainstream media." All smart folks, I'm sure, but I would be hard pressed to spy the public intellectual in the group. But what the hey? Mr. Jacobson sees straw men everywhere, while professing concern about calling a spade a spade.
"The effect of these accusations is poisonous. Race is the most sensitive and inflammatory subject in this country. By turning every issue, even a discussion of health care policy, into an argument about race, liberals have created a politically explosive mixture in which the harder they seek to suppress opposing voices, the harder those voices seek to be heard." Suppress opposing voices, my un-educated ass. It was a summer of controverted voices, and signs with swastikas, and forged Kenyan birth certificates, and photshops of watermelons on the White House lawn. It was less policy debate than commie, czars, and open carry laws. It was the rebel yell screaming WTF, and a Congressman shouting "You Lie", in the well of the House Of Representatives. Anger was palpable in the summer of the "Other". And some of those voices, by no means all, but by any measure, many- were garden variety bigots, racist and know nothings. And it's hard not to take a swipe at the messenger when that mess of humanity is on your side.
"Everyone understands that Obama was not subject to the same scrutiny as other candidates because of the fear of being called a racist. That lack of scrutiny gave us a president whose moderate campaign rhetoric belied an underlying agenda which, if revealed during the campaign, would have resulted in an electoral landslide for McCain-Palin. The vocal opposition we are witnessing has everything to do with a sense of being betrayed not just by a candidate, but by a process which was rigged by the use of the race card.", writes Mr. Jacobson.
Everyone understands! I don't. OK. To be fair, how well the "Other" is vetted is subjective. But the ultimate scrutiny of a candidate's viability is a decision best left to the electorate. Then again, we have the Supreme Court. Mr. Jacobson did mention a rigged process. But don't you get the feeling he feels it was rigged only because the outcome wasn't to his liking.
A pretty tepid and
template post from an Associate Clinical Professor of Law at Cornell Law. But to his credit Mr. Jacobson didn't use "Egg Head."
Cross Posted @
Douglastpost